"에세이리뷰"가 "워드바이스"로 새롭게 개편되었습니다.

EssayReview
을지대학교병원/캠퍼스 전용 영문교정·학술번역 서비스
을지대학교병원/캠퍼스

을지대학교병원/캠퍼스 연구자를 위한 논문 영문교정·학술번역 서비스 (개인 결제)

워드바이스(에세이리뷰)는 을지대학교병원/캠퍼스 논문교정 협약업체입니다. 기관 할인가로 원어민 전문가의 영문교정 및 학술번역 서비스를 24시간 365일 이용하실 수 있습니다.

OUR PARTNERS

파트너 및 고객사

17만 명 이상의 고객과 24만 건 이상의 첨삭 경험으로 세계 명문대 합격과 해외 유수 저널 게재 성과를 만들어왔습니다.

강원대학교
경기대학교
경북대학교
고려대학교
국민대학교
동국대학교
국립부경대학교
부산대학교
서강대학교 동아연구소
서울대학교 행정대학원
서울시립대학교
아주대학교
연세대학교
영남대학교
울산대학교
을지대학교
이화여자대학교
인하대학교
전남대학교
전북대학교
제주대학교
중앙대학교
충남대학교
한림대학교
한양대학교
대구경북과학기술원 DGIST
POSTECH
UNIST
EDITOR NETWORK

영미권 석·박사 원어민 에디터 2,000+명

CLIENT REVIEWS

추천사 및 고객 리뷰

차혁진
차혁진 / 부교수
서울대학교, 약학대학
많은 영문 교정 업체를 이용해보았지만, 워드바이스(에세이리뷰는 합리적인 가격에 빠른 서비스를 제공하고 있는 것 같습니다. 영문 교정도 단순 오탈자 교정이 아닌 명확한 의미 전달을 위해 문장 구조를 바꾸어 주고, 친절한 설명을 추가해 줍니다. 합리적인 가격대에 좋은 교정 서비스를 제공한다고 생각합니다.

Instructions: AMA style

Participants and Study Design

A total of 45 healthyforty-five adult participants with good health, including 23 women and 22 men ranging in aged from 21 to 64 years, were recruited from the local community through flyers, using fliers and online advertisements, and institutional mailing lists. Eligibility criteria required the absence of any The participants were included if they had no history of a neurological or psychiatric disorders, no contra-indications for to MRI (including metallic implants or scans like metal implanting or claustrophobia), and no current use of if they were not taking doses of any psychoactive medications at the time of participation. when they participated. All of the participants provided signed written informed consent, forms and the study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of at XX University. To minimize physiological variability and enhance the reliability of imaging outcomes, Also, participants were instructed to abstain from asked to avoid caffeine, alcohol, and strenuous physical activity or stressful exercise for 12 hours prior to scanning. for twelve hours before the scan to reduce variation and make the scan results more reliable. Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), with all participants Participants also completed the MMSE, achieving scores of 28. or above, In addition, and a general health screening was conducted to confirm eligibility and to exclude any potential see if there were no confounding medical health conditions that could influence affect the brain measurements. (1,2,3).

MRI Acquisition, Processing, and Preliminary Results

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were MRI data was acquired through using a 3.0-T 3-Tesla Siemens Mmagnetom Pprisma system equipped with a with an 64-channel head coil. High-resolution structural images were obtained using a standard T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) and standard T1-weighted MPRAGE sequence with the following parameters: repetition time (TR), 2300 ms; (TR=2300 ms; echo time (TE), 2.98 ms; TE=2.98 ms; inversion time (TI), 900 ms; TIi=900 ms; flip angle, 9°; flip-angle 9 degrees; field of view (FOV), FOV 256x × 256 mm2; and isotropic voxel size 1 × x1 × x1 mm3). Image preprocessing was performed using Then we pre-processed the images using FreeSurfer version 7.1, which and included: skull stripping, tissue segmentation, and cortical surface reconstruction., and Qquality control procedures were conducted by was done by two independent raters, and datasets exhibiting significant scans that had various motion artifacts or segmentation errors were excluded. exclusion of the data. Following this process, After, 3 participants were excluded at this stage, resulting in a final analytic making a final analysis sample of 423 participants.

The focus of Ppreliminary analyses focused on bilateral was on cortical volumes within the in prefrontal and temporal lobes bilaterally. The mean Mean prefrontal cortical volume was 194.3 ± 13.8 cm3, whereas the mean and temporal lobe volume was 168.5 ± 12.4 cm3. Variability was observed in We found some varibility in prefrontal cortical volumes across participants, whereas while temporal lobe volumes were relatively consistent. was greatly similar. A general linear model adjusted for that controled for the participants age and sex indicated a modest association suggested a small relationship between prefrontal cortical volume and age (analysis of variance [ANOVA]: ANOVA F = 3.12; pP = 0.054)⁴,⁵,⁶,³ ).3–6 Tand these preliminary findings suggest that results indicate that some standardized high-resolution high-res MRI protocols are capable of detecting interindividual can accurately detect differences between individual patients in cortical structure, and it may be useful for future studies that study and may provide a useful framework for future investigations in clinical populations, includinge individuals patients with neurological or psychiatric disorders.

References

[1]1. Smith R.J. (2018). Neurological screening protocols and MRI eligibility criteria in healthy adult cohorts. Journal of Neuroimaging Res.earch, 2018;14(2):, 88-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jnr.2018.01.007

[2]2. Brown, A.K., Choi, S., Park, J.Y,. et al. Cortical volume variability and age-related decline in prefrontal regions: a cross-sectional MRI study. Neuroimage Clin. 2016;22(4):401-416. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2016.04.002.

WEWordvice Editor“forty-five adult participants with good health” was revised to “45 healthy adult participants” to align with academic conventions and improve conciseness.
WEWordvice Editor“fliers” was standardized to “flyers,” ensuring consistency with formal academic usage.
WEWordvice Editor“The participants were included if they had no history…” was replaced with “Eligibility criteria required the absence of any history…,” which strengthens scientific tone and aligns with standard reporting conventions.
WEWordvice EditorAlso, “metal implanting” was corrected to “metallic implants,” improving technical accuracy.
WEWordvice EditorThe phrase “to reduce variation and make the scan results more reliable” was moved to the start of the sentence and elevated to “to minimize physiological variability and enhance the reliability of imaging outcomes.” This more precisely conveys methodological intent using discipline-specific language.
WEWordvice EditorCitations reformatted for consistency with AMA style. I have made these corrections throughout your manuscript.
WEWordvice EditorIn academic writing, abbreviations like "MRI" should be spelled out at the start of a sentence. “data was acquired through…” was replaced with “data were acquired using…,” correcting subject–verb agreement and improving phrasing.
WEWordvice EditorAbbreviation spelled out on first mention.
WEWordvice EditorThe original sequence parameters were retained but reformatted into a standardized list structure with clearer labeling. For example, “TR=2300 ms” was replaced with “repetition time (TR), 2300 ms,” which enhances interpretability.
WEWordvice EditorThe phrase “scans that had various motion artifacts or segmentation errors were exclusion of the data” was corrected to “datasets exhibiting significant motion artifacts or segmentation errors were excluded,” which resolves grammatical errors and improves clarity while preserving meaning.
WEWordvice EditorThis revision improves grammatical flow and clarity by replacing the fragmented transition “After,” with “Following this process,” which provides a clearer temporal link to the preceding procedures.
WEWordvice EditorConfirmation needed: The sample group initially included 45 participants, which should be reduced to 42 participants if 3 were excluded.
WEWordvice EditorHere, the phrase “The focus of preliminary analyses was on…” was simplified to “Preliminary analyses focused on…,” which improves concision.
WEWordvice EditorThe unit “cm” was corrected to “cm³,” ensuring dimensional accuracy for volume measurements.
WEWordvice EditorThe phrase “We found some varibility…” was revised to “Variability was observed…,” which corrects spelling and shifts to a more objective tone.
WEWordvice Editor“greatly similar” was replaced with “relatively consistent,” which provides a more appropriate and precise scientific description.
WEWordvice EditorThe phrase “that controled for the participants age and sex” was corrected to “adjusted for age and sex,” which is both grammatically correct and more concise.
WEWordvice EditorThe expression “a small relationship” was refined to “a modest association,” which provides a more appropriate interpretation of statistical findings.
WEWordvice EditorThe statistical reporting was standardized by replacing “ANOVA F = 3.12 p= 0.054” with “ANOVA: F = 3.12; P = .054,” improving readability as well as adherence to reporting conventions and AMA style.
WEWordvice Editor“future studies that study clinical populations include patients…” was clarified to “future investigations in clinical populations, including individuals…,” reducing redundancy and enhancing fluency.
WEWordvice EditorThese references were revised to adhere to AMA style formatting.

Instructions: IEEE formatting

III. System cChallenges and dDesign fFramework

Reliable signal transmission of signals and accurate perception are the mainremain significant challenges in modern wireless communication systems, especially particularly in next-generation mobile networks, Internet Oof Things (IoT) environments, and low-latency edge computing scenarios. Real,-world deployments cases are usually highly diverse and can causeoften introduce severe interference, where. Consequently, communication systems must operate under challenging constraints like, including multipath fading, low signal-to-noise ratios (SNR < −5 dB), and limited labelled training data, in addition; these kind of challenges. These factors significantly degrade system performance and also can hinder robust signal interpretation forin complex environments, therefore. To address these challenges, this study looks atinvestigates two mainkey technologies targeting both 2D signal representations (i.e., time-frequency analysis) and high-dimensional channel state information: (CSI): (1) adaptive signal detection in noisy channels and (2) sparse channel state reconstruction, which are both very important. These approaches represent critical and relevant topics in the fieldresearch directions for improving reliability and efficiency in advanced wireless communication systems.

VI. Methods and pPerformance eEvaluation

First, an adaptive signal detection framework is proposed for interference-rich wireless environments are proposed in this paper. A lightweight feature extraction module was designedis developed to make capturinge complex signal distributions and enhance weak signal components, alongside. In addition, a multi-scale- feature aggregation mechanism and is incorporated to improve representation across different resolutions, while a context-aware filtering module to avoid intereference and improve themitigates interference and enhances boundary discrimination for boundaries. The overall architecture of the proposed detection framework is shownillustrated in FigureFig. 2, which displays the overall structure of the full system design. Experimental results on benchmark communication datasets demonstrates that the proposedal method improves detection accuracy by 6.8 % in under low-SNR conditions compared to baseline models, with. Furthermore, false alarm rates are reduced from 12.4% to 7.1%, and the framework achieves a mean detection latency of 3.2 ms [1], [2].

Second, a local-global feature fusion framework is developed for sparse channel reconstruction is developed to address incomplete and irregularly sampled channel state information (CSI). The proposed model usesemploys hierarchical feature learning combined with a global attention mechanism and an adaptive fusion strategy enabling. This design enables efficient reconstruction under limited data availability and partially observed channel conditions and in situations where data may not be completely available or complete. Experimental evaluations shows: that, even with only 5% of channel samples available, the proposed approach givesachieves a normalized mean squared error (NMSE) of -18.3 dB and aimproves reconstruction accuracy improvement of by 3.1% better thancompared to existing methods, while . Additionally, computational overhead is reduced by aroundapproximately 22% relative to comparable deep- learning baselines [3], [4], [][5].

References

[1] J.-H. Kim, and S. Park, "Adaptive signal detection in low-SNR wireless environments using multi-scale feature aggregation," IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1842-1855, 2022.

[2] C. Wang, Y. Zhang, and L. Chen, "Sparse channel state reconstruction under limited sampling conditions for next-generation networks," in Proc. IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Madrid, Spain, 2020, pp. 1–6, 2020.

WEWordvice EditorAs requested, I have checked that the paper complies with IEEE conventions.
WEWordvice EditorThis is a more concise word choice.
WEWordvice EditorI have added “accurate” to clarify that correct and reliable perception is a key challenge, and not just perception.
WEWordvice EditorIn academic writing, abbreviations should be introduced by writing out the full term at first mention, followed by the abbreviated form in parentheses, unless the abbreviation is widely accepted or explicitly allowed by the journal. After this initial definition, only the abbreviation should be used consistently.
WEWordvice EditorI have started a new sentence to clearly separate the cause (diverse, interference-prone environments) from the resulting requirement (operating under strict constraints), improving the logical progression easier to follow.
WEWordvice EditorThis is the correct spelling in American English (i.e., single “l”). Double “l” is used in British English.
WEWordvice EditorThis is the correct and formal word choice here. “Looks at” is conversational and not preferred in academic writing.
WEWordvice EditorI have added this sentence to highlight the significance of the proposed approaches. Please confirm that this conveys your intended meaning.
WEWordvice EditorI have removed the hyphen after “scale” because “multi-scale” already functions as a complete compound modifier before “feature aggregation”; adding an extra hyphen would be grammatically incorrect.
WEWordvice EditorThe added information clarifies the specific roles of each module, which improves flow by creating a logical progression: from feature extraction → aggregation → filtering.
WEWordvice EditorAs per the IEEE guidelines: When referencing your figures and tables within your article, use the abbreviation “Fig.” even at the beginning of a sentence.
WEWordvice Editor“Demonstrate” is used because the subject “Experimental results” is plural, so the verb must also be plural. In English, plural subjects take the base verb form (no “-s”), while singular subjects take “-s” (e.g., “result demonstrates” vs. “results demonstrate”).
WEWordvice EditorI have formatted the in-text citations as per the journal guidelines.
WEWordvice EditorI have changed hyphen to en dash to indicate a relationship or interaction between two equal components, which is the correct rule in academic writing.
WEWordvice EditorThis is the correct minus symbol.
WEWordvice EditorIn academic writing, “approximately” is preferred over “around/about/roughly.”
WEWordvice EditorIn IEEE style, journal articles list page numbers before the year, whereas conference papers place the year before page numbers.

Instructions: APA style

Study Design and Participants Selection

This study uses adopts a mixed-methods design to examine investigate the question “ how do Confucian cultural values influences Korean university students’the adoption and perceived social utility of artificial intelligence (AI)-based mental health support tools among Korean university students. Korean youth represent a particularlyspecifically relevant population because they combinegiven the coexistence of high digital literacy with intense, overwhelming academic pressure, and persistent cultural stigma surrounding mental health help-seeking, which is a an issue of growing importancevery important and relevant topic in todays Korean society.

We recruited A total of 214 participants for the study were recruited usingwith stratified sampling across four universities in Seoul, Busan, and Daejeon. , and aAll participantsof them provided anonymized response responsesdata for this study. Participants were eligible included for the study if they were enrolled in undergraduate or postgraduate students aged 18-30 years, who had used at least one AI wellness application within the previouspreceding 6 six months. ParticipantsThey completed the Korean Confucian values Values inventory Inventory (K-CVI; Yoon & Lim, 2019,) and the AI mentalMental- health Health acceptenceAcceptance scale Scale (AMAS;, Jung et. al., 2022), both measured onwith a 7seven-point Likert scale.

AlsoIn addition, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 28 of the studentsparticipants to lookexamine at qualitative quality patterns in help-seeking help behaviors and attitudes toward AI-mediated emotional support (Figure 31.). We set Statiststatistical significance was set at P p < 0.05, and reported quantitative results data was reported as means ±and standard deviation.

Figure 1

Title of Figure 1 on this Line in this Style

[insert Figure 1 here]

Confucian valuesValues, stigmaStigma, and Acceptance of AI Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Mental Health Support Acceptance

Participants with higher scores on face-saving cultural norms reported significantly greaterThe mean AI mental mental health health acceptance acceptancescores were much higher in participants who tested higher for face-saving cultural norms (ANOVA F(n, n) = 8.,14, P p < 0.0010.001). The pParticipants in the high face-saving group said they are more willingreported greater willingness to use tools that use AI AI-supported tools, (M = 5.6, ±SD = 0.7) than those in compared to the low face-saving group, (M = 3.9, ± SD = 1.0). These results, which suggests that perceived anonymity reduces perception of being anonymous lowers the social risk risks usually related toassociated with disclosing releasing mental health concernsproblems in Korean culture and society. In addition, Scores for stigma stigma scores were showed a strong positive correlation positively correlated with AI acceptance (r = 0.71, p < 0.001) and a negative correlationthey were negatively correlated with preferences for human-based counseling (r = 0.58, p < 0.001), as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2

Title of Figure 2 on this Line in this Style

[insert Figure 2 here]

Our qualitative findings gave provide important context for understanding these patterns and help explainto understand the broader results of the study. The studentsParticipants frequently described reluctance to seekoften talked about feeling reluctant about seeking human counseling, due to because of concerns about appearingperception of being weak or burdensome by to family and peers, and these concerns are also widely documented in prior shown in the current literature research (Kim & Park, 2020; leeLee et al., 2019; Choi, 2021). Participants consistently perceived AI tools were commonly believed as socially -safe, exactly because they do notdont involve direct human interactionreal humans,, operate they are outside existing social networks the human relation network, and carryhave no risk of damaging interpersonal reputations. These findings show that AI mental health tools are afunction as culturally specific and culturally meaningful entry pointselement for emotional expression in contextsamong groups where disclosingpublicization of mental concerns entails problems carries significanthigh social costs.

References

Kim, S. J., & Park, H. W. (2020). Cultural stigma, face-saving behavior, and mental health help-seeking attitudes among Korean young adults: implications Implications for digital intervention design. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,. 51(6),. pp. 442–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022120934172

leeLee, J. Y., Choi, M., and Kwon, S. H., & Kim, D. R., (2019). Confucian values and technology acceptance in mental health contexts: A survey study of university students in South Korea. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(9), p.812-830. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1574given

WEWordvice Editor“investigate the question” is indirect and wordy. Sentence reframed to improve clarity and reading flow
WEWordvice EditorRemember to define all acronyms on first use.
WEWordvice EditorClarity and flow improved, wordiness reduced: “very important and relevant” is redundant in context since the words repeat the same idea.
WEWordvice EditorAlternatively, you could write “in contemporary Korean society”
WEWordvice Editor“for the study” is unnecessary in context. It’s a given and does not need to be stated here. For your consideration
WEWordvice Editor“all of them” is not clear. Are you referring to the participants? The universities? Please check and confirm that I retained your intended meaning.
WEWordvice Editor“if they were enrolled in undergraduate or postgraduate students” is incorrect – a parallel structure is required here. You can say “if they were undergraduate or postgraduate students” OR “if they were enrolled in undergraduate or postgraduate programs”
WEWordvice EditorWhile “preceding” is okay, most academic writing prefers “previous” because it is more natural. “preceding” emphasizes an immediate sequence or order, whereas “previous” refers to something that happened before now.
WEWordvice EditorCapitalize names of scales/inventories, etc.
WEWordvice EditorNo period after “et” in "et al."
WEWordvice EditorSlight reframe to improve flow. “in addition” is a better fit at the start of a new sentence since it signals a new point, whereas “also” aligns better when adding a minor point within a sentence
WEWordvice EditorFigures should be numbered sequentially starting with “1". Once you mention a figure or table, place it immediately after the corresponding paragraph. If no figure or table is available, insert a placeholder; I added placeholders for you.
WEWordvice EditorIn APA, it’s okay not to include the leading zero, but please be consistent throughout the text. I notice later that you do include a leading zero, so for consistency, I added the leading zero here
WEWordvice EditorThis sentence was reframed to improve clarity and flow.
WEWordvice EditorConfirm: “ANOVA” doesn’t seem to fit the context, so I deleted it. Please add the correct df.
WEWordvice EditorCorrected to comply with APA format.
WEWordvice EditorTo reduce wordiness and improve clarity and flow, the best wording is “that perceived anonymity reduces…”
WEWordvice Editor“releasing” doesn’t fit the context; it implies that you are making something available. In this context, “disclosing” is a better fit because it relates to revealing information that is usually personal or sensitive
WEWordvice Editor“culture” and “society” are redundant in this context.
WEWordvice EditorThis sentence was wordy, repetitive, and grammatically incorrect. Reframed to improve clarity and reading flow.
WEWordvice Editor“the students often talked about feeling reluctant about seeking…” is wordy and unnatural. Also, “students” is not clear in context; use “participants”.
WEWordvice Editor“current literature” doesn’t fit the context. "prior research" is more accurate.
WEWordvice EditorReplaced "are" with "function as"- The verb “are” offers a general description, whereas “function as” emphasizes the role of these tools. “function as” is more analytical and provides a more theoretically grounded tone in this context.
WEWordvice EditorAPA references are arranged alphabetically, not numbered.
WEWordvice EditorCapitalize the first word after a colon
WEWordvice EditorThe journal name and volume number are italicized
WEWordvice EditorAPA does not use “pp.” before page numbers in the reference list (unless referring to a range of pages in a book). See this link for more info: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_style_introduction.html
WEWordvice EditorUse the en dash in number ranges
WEWordvice Editor“retrieved from” is unnecessary for journal articles

Instructions: Elsevier Harvard style

Cell Maintenance and Exposure Conditions

We grew hHuman skin cellfibroblasts (BJj-5ta fibroblasts) were cultured in a standard growthnutrient mediumsolution at 37 °C in a controlled, incubator environment. Cells were usmaintained at an earlylow and, consistent passage number to ensure reproducliable behavior across the experiments. Before the treatment, the cells were seededput eveuniformly into multiwell plates at a standard density and after that they were allowed to adheresettle for 24 hours before any exposure started.

Cells Wwere exposed the cells to titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2-NPs;, 20 nm) at three3 concentrations: low (10 μg/mL), medium (10 μg/mL), and high (500 μg/mL) using an in vitro dose-response model. Ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation was included asfor a comparativeson stressors at low and high doses. Ccontrol groups were maintained under the same conditions without no nanoparticle or radiation exposure. NewFresh exposure solutions were prepared atwhen each medium change, and all the treatments were administeredgiven over a 3 -days period. AllEvery experiments wereas repeaconducted in triplicate3x independently, and the results were considered statistically significant at pP < .05. Cell Mmorphology of the cells wasere also observassessed and identified usingnder light microscopy at 24- h, 48- h, and 72 -hours post-exposure, toand monitored any visible structural changes andor signindicators of cellular stress across the treatment groups. All of the experimental procedures were conducted in accordance followingth institutional biosafety guidelines, and all relevant ethical approvals were obtained before the beginning of the study initiation.

Cell Vviability and Gene eExpression aAnalysis

FollowingAfter the exposure, the amount of surviving cells viability in the groups wasere measurquantified using a standard colorimetric assay. Cell viability decreased progressively at medium and high nanoparticle concentrations, with the highestreaching at 74.6 ± 4.8 % and 51.3 ± 6.2%, respectivelyat medium and high concentrations, and at the same time,. hHigh-dose UVB exposure showresulted in the most lowest viability across all treatment groups, (48.9 ± 5.7%) as shown in (Fig. 3). Genes related to oOxidative stress-related genes were significantly upregulated at medium/ and high nanoparticle concentrations, whileand DNA- repair-related genes were downregulated withen theincreasing concentration increased (0.38 ± 0.09-fold comparedrelative to control). Inflammatory marker genes showered a significantly upregulatedincrease at low/medium concentrations but did not differ significaently different from the control at the highest concentration, consistent with the this pattern have been previously reported in vitro under conditions of severeoverwhelming cellular stress (Kim et. al., 2021;. Ppark and& Lee, 2019; Fig.ure 2).

REFERENCEeferences LIST

  1. Kim, J.H., Choi, S., Lee, K.M., Park, J.Y. and Yoon, H. (2021). Concentration-dependent oxidative stress responses in human dermal fibroblasts following tTitanium dDioxide nanoparticle exposure: Implications for inflammatory feedback regulation’,. Journal of Cellular Toxicology and Environmental Health,. 48(3), pp. 214-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcteh.2021.03.014.
  2. Park, S.J. and& Lee, B.R., (2019). Ultraviolet B-induced suppression of DNA repair pathways in primary human skin cells and its relationship to inflammatory cytokine expression’,. Toxicological Science., 162(1), p. 88–101. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfy289.
WEWordvice EditorReworded to match standard naming conventions (capitalization and ordering).
WEWordvice EditorRevised "grew" to "cultured" for accurate scientific terminology.
WEWordvice EditorRevised to align with standard scientific language, emphasizing reproducibility.
WEWordvice Editor“Seeded uniformly” is the precise laboratory term.
WEWordvice EditorAdded to follow SI unit spacing rules.
WEWordvice EditorIn formal writing, numbers one through nine are usually written out as words unless part of specific data.
WEWordvice EditorThis appears to be an internal inconsistency requiring correction for scientific validity. Consider checking this for logical dose progression. Both the low and medium doses cannot have the same concentration of 10. Please check.
WEWordvice EditorAn en dash (–) is used to indicate a range of values (e.g., June 12–15, 2023), scores or results (e.g., 3–2), to connect prefixes to open compounds (e.g., pre–World War II), and in complex compound adjectives (e.g., Los Angeles–New York flight).
WEWordvice EditorAbbreviations are usually defined at first use in the abstract and text. Hence, I have deleted the full form accordingly since it has been defined initially.
WEWordvice EditorPluralized for subject–verb agreement and capitalization.
WEWordvice EditorRevised to align with standard laboratory phrasing.
WEWordvice EditorReworded to use standard scientific phrasing.
WEWordvice EditorStatistical notation aligned with Harvard style.
WEWordvice EditorRevised for precision and standard terminology in cell biology.
WEWordvice EditorCorrected spacing for consistency with scientific formatting.
WEWordvice EditorAdded to clearly associate each value with its corresponding concentration.
WEWordvice EditorMost journals and academic texts use parenthetical figure references to maintain flow and avoid interrupting the sentence structure.
WEWordvice EditorHarvard style guides: 1 author: (Davis, 2019); 2 authors: (Davis and Barrett, 2019); 3 authors: (Davis, Barrett and McLachlan, 2019); 4+ authors: (Davis et al., 2019). The in-text citation has been formatted to conform to the style guides.
WEWordvice EditorCorrected for consistency in style.
WEWordvice EditorNo period is required after the publication year.
WEWordvice EditorArticle titles are enclosed in single quotes in Harvard style.
WEWordvice EditorJournal names are italicized in Harvard style.
WEWordvice EditorA comma is required after the journal name, not a period.
WEWordvice EditorAn en dash is used for indicating range in Harvard style.
WEWordvice EditorPublication year is enclosed in parentheses per style guide.
WEWordvice EditorFull journal name is required, not abbreviated.
WEWordvice EditorRemoved as it’s not required.

Instructions: APA Style

I. Introduction

CAlthough consumer debt management is a bigmajor issue in today's contemporary household finance, but the regulatory framework aboutgoverning how lenders assess borrower'sborrower risk is still not consistent. remains inconsistent. Research and policy analysis consistentlyanalyses show growingincreasing divergence aboutin how the ways financial institutions evaluate credit-worthiness, like creditworthiness, including differences in income verification standards differences, debt-to-income levelsthresholds, and credit scores; scoring practices. These variations are often justified by the local housing market conditions and the demographicsborrower demographic characteristics of the borrowers. These differences are applied with difficulty. Such inconsistencies make it difficult for borrowers to compare or anticipate, and this kind of inconsistencies creates lending criteria, creating real burdens for everyday households, making it harder for consumers and complicating efforts to identifying the mostidentify suitable credit products. BigAlthough large banks increasingly offer standardized loan products in regional markets, but at the same timeacross regions, local lenders retain strong incentives to apply institution specific underwriting criterias, creating conflictscriteria, generating tension between market-wide efficiency and localisedlocalized lending practices (Johnson, & Rodrigues, 2019; Williams, 2021).

This study addressesseeks to answer the question ": “How dodoes variation in affordability difference assessment compliance among retail lenders effectaffect household debt outcomes in regional markets"??” A total of 412 participants (N = 412) were recruited across mortgage, personal credit, and consumer installment lending sectors, which all gaveof whom provided anonymized loan-level data for yearsfrom 2015- to 2025. The survey instrument comprisedincluded 38 items adapted from the Consumer Credit Compliance Assessment Tool (CCCCAT; Harrison & Moore, 2013) and the Household Financial Vulnerability Index (HFVI; Reyes et. al., 2009), rated on a 5 point Likert scale. IBM SPSS AMOS (Version 28.0) was used to conduct structural equation modeling (SEM were performed with) AMOS 28.0, yielding acceptable model fit: χ²/df = 2.47, CFI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.061.

II.

Background and the Structure of Affordability Assessment Rules

ThePost2008 consumer credit reform agenda after the 2008 financial crisis andreforms were designed to address fundamental failures in pre-crisis lending practices, importantlyparticularly the wide-spreadwidespread extension of mortgages to borrowers who's actualwhose ability to repay wasnthad not been verified. Lender reliance on rising asset prices, rather thenthan borrower income, produced dangerously unsustainable levels of household debt, amplifing levels, amplifying economic damage oncewhen housing values went down. declined. In response, regulators perusedpursued a dual approach: risingraising minimum standards for income verification whilestandards and requiring lenders to document that borrowers could sustain repayments without relying on asset apreciationappreciation (Brown & Lee, 2020; Davis, et al., 2018; see Figure 2).

Preliminary analysis revealedshowed that mean compliance scores waswere M = 3.6, ±SD = 0.7 on the CCCAT, meanwhile CCCAT, while average borrower debt-to-income ratios were M = 41.3%, SD = ±8.2%. A general linear model that was controlling for lender size showedindicated a marginal association between compliance stringency and reduced default rates (ANOVA: F(1, 410) = 4.08, P= 0p = .047), with the community lenders havingexhibiting lower compliance scores but more stable default outcomes (Garcia et al., 2019; Thompson, 2022, garcia et al., 2019.)).

References

Thompson, R. K., . (2022.). Regulatory standardization and household debt outcomes: complianceCompliance stringency, default rates, and the role of community lenders in regional credit markets. Journal of Consumer Finance and Policy, 33(2). pp.), 87-104. - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcfp.2022.02.009

WEWordvice EditorEdits here make the phrasing more precise and the tone more academic.
WEWordvice EditorPhrasing tightened for concision and accuracy.
WEWordvice EditorTightened sentence for clarity and to improve flow.
WEWordvice EditorModified for American spelling.
WEWordvice EditorCorrected citation punctuation to APA style.
WEWordvice EditorCorrected grammar and added colon for proper question introduction.
WEWordvice EditorCorrected typo
WEWordvice EditorCorrected “et. al.” to “et al.”
WEWordvice EditorAPA style prefers using the full proper name.
WEWordvice EditorAdded “Structural equation modeling” for clarity.
WEWordvice EditorTightened phrasing without removing detail.
WEWordvice EditorIn these sentences, I corrected typos and citation formatting while reducing wordiness.
WEWordvice EditorAPA prefers M = #.#, SD = #.# for Mean/SD format.
WEWordvice EditorCorrected to APA citation style. APA requires degrees of freedom, please adjust if different.
WEWordvice EditorAccording to APA style, in-text citations should be ordered alphabetically.
WEWordvice EditorReference formatting revised based on APA guidelines (author initials, year in parentheses, italicized journal title and volume, issue in parentheses, page range en-dash, DOI as URL.)

자주 묻는 질문

영문교정은 문법 오류, 어색한 표현, 부정확한 문장 구조를 수정하여 문서의 신뢰도와 전달력을 개선하기 위해 필요합니다. 아무리 좋은 연구 성과나 경험이 있어도 영어가 부자연스럽거나 오류가 많으면 저널 게재, 입학, 채용 과정에서 불리하게 작용할 수 있습니다. 워드바이스 영어 교정 서비스는 영어 문서의 문법, 철자, 구문, 문체, 어휘를 원어민 수준과 학술적 기준에 맞게 검토하여 오류를 수정하고 가독성을 높이는 서비스입니다. 논문, 에세이, 비즈니스 문서 등 다양한 글의 논리 흐름과 자연스러운 표현을 강화해 글의 전달력을 높입니다.

평균 경력 10년 이상의 영미권 석·박사 원어민 에디터 2,000명 이상으로 구성되어 있으며, 215개 학문 분야별로 문서 유형에 가장 적합한 에디터를 배정해드립니다.

의학·생명과학, 공학, 자연과학, 인문학, 사회과학·경영학 등 215개 세부 학문 분야를 다루고 있습니다. 전공 용어와 학술적 맥락을 이해하는 석·박사급 원어민 에디터가 교정을 진행하여, 문서 내용의 정확성을 유지하면서 영어 표현의 완성도를 높입니다.

워드바이스는 학술, 유학 지원, 취업 분야의 다양한 문서에 대해 영문 교정과 한영 번역 서비스를 제공합니다. 영문 교정 서비스 - 영어 논문 교정: 문법·학술 문체·저널 포맷까지 정교하게 교정해 저널 게재 가능성을 높여 드립니다. - 학위 논문 영문 교정: 장문의 원고 전반을 일관된 학술 톤과 포맷으로 다듬어 연구의 신뢰성을 높여 드립니다. - 학술 에세이 영문 교정: 문법·표현과 인용 포맷까지 점검해 감점 요인 없이 과제를 제출하실 수 있도록 도와드립니다. - 학업계획서(SOP) 영문 교정: 문장 구조와 논리 흐름까지 다듬어 지원자의 학문적 역량이 설득력 있게 전달되도록 해 드립니다. - 유학 에세이 영문 교정: 지원자만의 개성을 유지하며 자연스러운 영어로 교정해 어드미션에서 돋보이도록 해 드립니다. - 추천서 영문 교정: 톤과 서신 격식을 맞춰 교정해 추천인의 신뢰도와 지원자의 강점이 모두 드러나도록 해 드립니다. - CV/이력서 영문 교정: 성과 중심 표현과 직무 키워드를 최적화해 수초 내 서류 심사에서 경쟁력을 높여 드립니다. - 커버레터 영문 교정: 톤과 전달력에 집중해 교정해 해당 직무에 적합한 후보임이 설득력 있게 전달되도록 해 드립니다. 한영 번역 서비스 - 논문 번역: 전공별 번역가와 원어민 에디터의 이중 검수로 저널 투고에 적합한 학술 문체로 완성해 드립니다. - SOP 번역: 전공 번역가와 명문대 출신 에디터가 번역·교정해 학술적 전문성과 설득력을 모두 살려 드립니다. - 에세이 번역: 어드미션 전문가가 스토리텔링까지 최적화해 지원자의 개성과 스토리를 생생하게 전달해 드립니다. - 추천서 번역: 추천인의 진정성을 유지하면서 공식적인 표현으로 번역해 드립니다. - 이력서 번역: 직함과 경력을 글로벌 기준에 맞는 성과 중심 문장으로 재구성해 드립니다.

네, 연중무휴 24시간 접수가 가능하며 결제 확인 즉시 작업이 시작됩니다. 최소 9시간부터 최대 7일까지 납기를 선택할 수 있고, 납기 준수율 99.8%로 촉박한 마감에도 안정적인 일정 관리가 가능합니다. 진행 상황은 이메일·문자·카카오톡으로 실시간 안내드립니다.

모든 에디터는 NDA(비밀유지계약)를 체결하고 AES-256 암호화로 보안을 유지합니다. 접수된 문서는 배정된 에디터와 프로젝트 관리자만 접근할 수 있으며, 고객 동의 없이 외부에 공유되지 않습니다.

MS Word(.doc, .docx) 형식으로 접수할 수 있으며, 결과물은 Track Changes가 적용된 Word 파일로 제공됩니다.

프리미엄 영문 교정은 완료일 기준 365일(아카데믹)·14일(어드미션) 이내 무제한 무료 재교정을 제공하며, 일반 교정도 완료일 기준 21일 이내에 30% 할인된 비용으로 재교정을 이용할 수 있습니다.